MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406973519 · doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2025.100449

Nongravid incarcerated uterus with leiomyomas treated with uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy: a case report

2025· article· en· W4406973519 on OpenAlexaff
Signy Holmes, Jen Tomlinson, Peter Klippenstein, Elly Trepman, John M. Embil

Bibliographic record

VenueAJOG Global Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUterine Myomas and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUterine artery embolizationHysterectomyUterusMedicineEmbolizationLeiomyomaUterine arteryGynecologyRadiologyPregnancyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The incarcerated uterus in the nongravid patient is rare, and usually is associated with uterine leiomyomas. Leiomyomas may be treated with uterine artery embolization, but the use of embolization has been reportedly rarely in treating nongravid uterine incarceration. Case: A 50-year-old gravida 2 para 2 woman presented with acute abdominal and flank pain and urinary retention. Her medical history included uterine leiomyomas and nephrolithiasis. Physical examination showed an enlarged uterus (size, 22 weeks). Magnetic resonance imaging showed an incarcerated uterus, complete bladder outlet obstruction, uterine retroflexion and enlargement, and leiomyomas. She was treated with an indwelling Foley catheter, preoperative uterine artery embolization, and total abdominal hysterectomy. Conclusion: Preoperative uterine artery embolization may be a useful adjunct to hysterectomy in the treatment of the nongravid incarcerated uterus associated with leiomyomas in women who have completed family planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAJOG Global ReportsSame topicUterine Myomas and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207