MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406993104 · doi:10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.ns1

Abstract NS1: Identification of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Impact of a Nurse Led Screening Tool Utilizing the Ottawa Rule

2025· article· en· W4406993104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
CHANDRA BROWER, SHANNON KRUMVIEDA

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubarachnoid hemorrhageStroke (engine)Identification (biology)Intracerebral hemorrhageIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The 2023 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association’s Guideline for Management of Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) support use of the Ottawa Rule to screen individuals at risk. Data showed SAH patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with headache (HA) and hypertension frequently had long wait times before evaluation by a provider. The ED lacked a formal triage process for identification of SAH resulting in delayed treatment. This gap could lead to suboptimal patient outcomes. Purpose: The goal of this project is to create a nurse-led screening tool for identifying patients at risk for SAH and aid in the decision for computed tomography (CT). Earlier identification, along with order set initiation, supports best practice. Method: Patients presenting with nontraumatic HA are assessed by an ED RN to determine if HA reached maximum intensity within one hour of initial onset. If criterion is met, a best practice alert (BPA) triggers within the electronic medical record. The Ottawa Rule displays in the BPA to provide guidelines to determine next steps. If the patient age is 40 or older, or meets criteria of the Ottawa Rule, the ED RN initiates a stat head CT per protocol. Patients with identified SAH are immediately roomed and seen by an ED physician, who consults the stroke team. Guideline-based cares, including blood pressure management are initiated. Results: Use of the Ottawa Rule screening tool on patient arrival to the ED leads to earlier identification of patients with SAH, reduction of door to seen by provider time and door to diagnostic times, plus allows for expediated initiation of blood pressure management. A total of nine direct arriving patients were reviewed over a one-year period. The six patients treated before the practice change had a median door to CT of 90 minutes and a median door to stroke provider time of 134 minutes. Following implementation, the door to stroke provider median time was 33 minutes and door to provider time decreased to 52 minutes. This reflects a decrease of 63% of median arrival time to CT and a 61% decrease of median arrival time to stroke provider. Since implementation, 100% of patients with SAH were immediately identified and treatment initiated. Conclusion: Nurse driven screening tool utilizing the Ottawa Rule expedited care for ED patients diagnosed with SAH. Faster time to diagnosis allows for targeted BP management and adherence to standard of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→