MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4406993133 · doi:10.1161/str.56.suppl_1.wp26

Abstract WP26: Determinants of Neuropsychological Function after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2025· article· en· W4406993133 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Sagues, A Gudino, Carlos Dier, M. Cabarique, Edgar A. Samaniego

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubarachnoid hemorrhageNeuropsychologyStroke (engine)RadiologySurgeryPsychiatryCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) survivors suffer cognitive and behavioral challenges preventing their return to work and social activities. The factors that may affect neuropsychological outcomes after aSAH are not well characterized. This study aimed to analyze the clinical variables associated with the neuropsychological function in a large cohort of aSAH survivors. Methods: Patients with aSAH admitted to our institution since 2009 were recruited. Clinical variables, modified Rankin score (mRS) at discharge, hemorrhage volume, and the occurrence of vasospasm or new ischemia during hospitalization were collected. Patients underwent Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Data was adjusted for sex, age, race, and years of education. Additionaly, patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory and the Stroke Specific Quality of Life questionnaires, while their families completed the Iowa Scale of Personality Changes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of neuropsychological outcomes. Results: A total of 165 aSAH survivors were enrolled in the study. Short (32/165 patients) - and long-term outcomes (127/165 patients) were analyzed (3-12 months and 1 to 15 years post-aSAH respectively). In the short term, MoCA was significantly worse (<25 th percentile for adjusted data, p 0.003) in patients with high mRS at discharge (median 3, IQR 2) compared to low mRS (median 1, IQR 2, OR:2.14, p 0.006). In the long term, MoCA was significantly worse in patients with higher Hunt and Hess (OR: 1.39, p 0.09), higher modified Fisher grades (OR: 1.29, p 0.1) and in patients who developed new radiological ischemia during hospitalization (OR: 3.42, p 0.03). Larger total hemorrhage volumes were significantly correlated with worse MoCA performance (β: 0.97, p=0.048, figure). Radiological vasospasm (β: -0.40, p 0.006), new ischemia (β: -0.37, p 0.012), and higher Hunt and Hess grades (β: -0.30, p 0.053) were identified as predictors of poorer quality of life. Additionally, lack of stamina and executive personality changes were among the most frequently reported changes by family members post-aSAH for patients. Conclusion: Short-term cognitive outcomes following aSAH are associated with the mRS at discharge, while long-term cognitive outcomes are predicted by the severity of aSAH as assessed by clinical scales. The development of new ischemia after aSAH independently predicts long-term cognitive outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications→French-language works237,207→