MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406993683 · doi:10.62463/surgery.95

Comparison of bilateral infraorbital nerve block versus intravenous ketorolac for cleft lip repair in children: a randomised controlled trial

2025· article· en· W4406993683 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Jika, Ibrahim Naziru, Akintubobo O Benedict, H. B. Galadima, Yahaya Halima Bidemi, Mohammed Bello, Abdulhamid Njidda Gyadale, Kalakwa Abdulmumuni Mohammed, Hassan Maina, Abubakar Ballah, Yusuf Adamu Baffah

Bibliographic record

VenueImpact Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCleft Lip and Palate Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKetorolacRandomized controlled trialAnesthesiaSurgeryAnalgesic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cleft lip repair in children is associated with significant postoperative pain, which, if inadequately managed, may lead to complications such as wound dehiscence and delayed recovery. Bilateral infraorbital nerve block (BIONB) with 0.25% bupivacaine has emerged as a potential alternative to intravenous ketorolac for postoperative analgesia. This randomized trial compares the analgesic efficacy and safety of BIONB with intravenous ketorolac in paediatric cleft lip repair. Methods: This randomized, prospective, double-blind study included 74 children aged 12–60 months undergoing elective cleft lip repair under general anaesthesia at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Participants were randomized into two groups: Group BO (BIONB with 1 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine per side) and Group KO (0.5 mg/kg intravenous ketorolac). The primary outcome was postoperative pain, assessed using the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS). Secondary outcomes included analgesic duration, rescue analgesic consumption, and complications. Data were analysed using independent sample t-tests, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 74 children were randomized, with 34 patients in each group contributing data to the primary outcome. BIONB demonstrated significantly lower mean CHEOPS scores in the immediate postoperative period (0-hour: 4.12 ± 0.5 vs. 8.61 ± 0.6, p=0.03). Analgesic duration was significantly longer in Group BO (8 hours) compared to Group KO (6 hours, p=0.03). Total rescue analgesic consumption over 24 hours was significantly lower in Group BO (223.08 ± 214.12 mg vs. 657.83 ± 248.49 mg, p=0.02). No complications were reported in either group. Conclusions: Bilateral infraorbital nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine is a safe and effective analgesic technique for cleft lip repair in children, providing superior pain control, prolonged analgesia, and reduced postoperative analgesic requirements compared to intravenous ketorolac. This technique should be considered as a valuable addition to postoperative pain management protocols in paediatric surgical patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueImpact SurgerySame topicCleft Lip and Palate ResearchFrench-language works237,207