MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4406999047 · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.196

A Canadian postmarket study of the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft

2025· article· en· W4406999047 on OpenAlexaffabout
Thomas F. Lindsay, John Harlock, Christine Herman, Jerry Yongqiang Chen, Adam Power, Alan T. Saunders

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vascular Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern UniversityVancouver General HospitalNova Scotia Health AuthorityHamilton General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity Health Network
FundersCook Medical
KeywordsMedicineZenithAlpha (finance)SurgeryRadiologyGeodesyPatient satisfaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the low-profile Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft in a Canadian postmarket setting. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, postmarket study was conducted at five sites in Canada between May 2017 and June 2018. Patients were treated for abdominal aortic or aortoiliac aneurysms using the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft and followed for 2 years after the initial procedure in accordance with each institution's standard of care. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients (mean age, 75.2 ± 7.4 years,; 88% male; 16% with aortoiliac aneurysms) were treated. Technical success was achieved in 99% of patients (98/99). One patient was excluded from the technical success end point owing to missing data. The single technical failure was due to partial coverage of the left renal artery by the main body graft. The mean follow-up duration was 635.9 ± 213.6 days. Device success through the 2-year follow-up was achieved in 86.9% of patients (86/99). Overall, nine deaths occurred; none were related to the study device or the procedure. No patient required conversion to open surgery. Through follow-up, four patients experienced a type I endoleak. There were no instances of type III or IV endoleaks. One case of aneurysm rupture (related to type Ib endoleak and retrograde migration of an iliac leg graft) was treated successfully with angioplasty, coil embolization, and iliac graft extension. Eight patients experienced aneurysm growth of >5 mm throughout follow-up. Iliac leg graft occlusions occurred in five patients. In total, 14 patients required 15 secondary interventions (SIs). Iliac leg graft-related SIs were performed in seven patients, for device occlusion (n = 3), kink or compression (n = 2), stenosis (n = 2), or nonocclusive thrombus (n = 3). Other reasons for SIs included type II endoleak (n = 8), type Ib endoleak (n = 2), iliac artery dissection (n = 1), abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (n = 1), and partial coverage of the left renal artery (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft demonstrates high rates of technical success, no open conversions, and no aneurysm -related mortality after abdominal aortic or aortoiliac aneurysm repair. Type I endoleak rates were low. These outcomes support the safety and performance of the Zenith Alpha Abdominal Endovascular Graft.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vascular SurgerySame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207