MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407000482 · doi:10.2196/65562

Effects of a Session of Exergames and Traditional Games on Inhibitory Control in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial

2025· article· en· W4407000482 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jamilly Karoliny da Silva Miranda, Rodrigo Alberto Vieira Browne, Weslley Quirino Alves da Silva, João Paulo Rodrigues dos Santos, Carmen Sílvia Grubert Campbell, Isabela Almeida Ramos

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Serious Games · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossover studyPreprintSession (web analytics)CrossoverAutism spectrum disorderAutismPsychologyAudiologyMedicineDevelopmental psychologyComputer sciencePlaceboAlternative medicineArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by deficits in executive functions, such as inhibitory control, which affect behavior and social adaptation. Although physical activity-based interventions, such as exergames, have shown potential to improve these functions, their comparative effects with active traditional games remain underexplored, particularly regarding inhibitory control in children with ASD. Objective: We aim to analyze the effects of a session of exergames and active traditional games on inhibitory control in children with ASD. Methods: This randomized controlled crossover trial included 9 male children with ASD (mean age 8.6, SD 1.4 y). Participants completed three 20-minute experimental sessions in random order, with a minimum interval of 48 hours: (1) active traditional games, (2) exergames using Just Dance 2022, and (3) a control session with manual painting activities. Inhibitory control was assessed 5 minutes postsession using a modified flanker task in the E-Prime (version 3.0; Psychological Software Tools Inc) program, recording reaction time (RT) and accuracy in congruent and incongruent phases. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare RT and accuracy between experimental and control conditions. Data are presented as means and 95% CIs. Results: There was a statistically significant effect of condition on RT in the incongruent phase (P=.02). RT in the exergame session (849 ms, 95% CI 642 to 1057) was lower compared to the traditional games (938 ms, 95% CI 684 to 1191; P=.02) and control (969 ms, 95% CI 742, 1196 to P=.01) sessions. No significant differences were observed in RT during the congruent phase or in accuracy across either phase. Conclusions: A 20-minute session of exergame improved inhibitory control performance in children with ASD compared to active traditional games and painting activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Serious GamesSame topicAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFrench-language works237,207