MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407011452 · doi:10.1200/po-24-00653

Digital Pathology–Based Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Scores and Outcomes in a Randomized Phase III Trial in Men With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

2025· article· en· W4407011452 on OpenAlex
Felix Y. Feng, Matthew R. Smith, Fred Saad, Pooya Mobadersany, Shaozhou K. Tian, Stephen Yip, Joel Greshock, Najat Khan, Sharon McCarthy, Sabine Brookman‐May, Ariel B. Bourla, Tamara R. Todorović, Rikiya Yamashita, Huei–Chung Huang, Trevor J. Royce, Timothy N. Showalter, Jacqueline Griffin, Akinori Mitani, Andre Esteva, Eric J. Small

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJCO Precision Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistopathologyHazard ratioProportional hazards modelMedicineProstate cancerInternal medicineOncologyUrologyClinical trialConfidence intervalCancerPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE The SPARTAN trial demonstrated that the addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy improves outcomes among patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). We applied a previously reported digital histopathology–based multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) algorithm to estimate clinical outcomes in SPARTAN. METHODS Patients with available hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides from the primary tumor were included. Histopathology slides were digitized. MMAI scores ranging from 0 to 1 were generated from digital histopathology and baseline clinical parameters. Patients were categorized into MMAI non–high-risk and high-risk groups using previously validated cutoffs. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for metastasis-free survival (MFS), second progression-free survival (PFS2), and overall survival (OS); comparisons were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression for treatment arms and MMAI risk. The interaction between treatment arm and risk group was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS The study included 420 evaluable patients after excluding those with missing clinical data or inadequate histopathology images. Of these, 63% (n = 266) were MMAI high risk and 37% (n = 154) were non–high risk. MMAI risk score was associated with shorter MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.72; P < .005), PFS2 (HR, 1.57; P < .005), and OS (HR, 1.41; P = .02). MMAI high-risk patients receiving apalutamide demonstrated significant improvement in MFS (HR, 0.19; P < .005), PFS2 (HR, 0.47; P < .005), and OS (HR, 0.6; P = .01). The interaction between MMAI risk score and treatment for MFS ( P = .01) and PFS2 ( P = .03) was significant, indicating greater benefit from apalutamide treatment in MMAI high-risk patients. CONCLUSION MMAI is a prognostic marker in nmCRPC and may serve as a predictive biomarker with high-risk patients deriving the greatest benefit from treatment with apalutamide. These results represent the first extension of an MMAI classifier to patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, warranting additional validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it