Expiration CT Gas Trapping Measures with Texture-Based Radiomics Improves Association with Lung Function and Lung Function Decline in COPD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives Several methods quantify gas-trapping on expiration computed tomography (CT) images, but they do not consider the spatial relationship of voxels. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of expiration CT texture-based radiomics features to existing gas-trapping measurements improves model performance for lung function, lung function decline, COPD classification and visual gas-trapping. Materials and Methods CanCOLD participants performed spirometry, plethysmography and CT chest imaging at full-inspiration/expiration with radiologist-assessed gas-trapping. Quantitative CT measurements were performed: low attenuation areas≤−856HU (LAA 856 ), ratio of expiratory-to-inspiratory mean lung attenuation (E/I MLA), and difference between expiratory-inspiratory lung volumes between −856 and −950 HU (RVC 856–950 ). Texture-based radiomics analysis generated 95 features; LASSO regression coefficients were summed to create a representative variable (RadScore). Multivariable linear regression models determined associations for baseline RV/TLC, FEV 1 /FVC, FEV 1 , FEF 25–75 , and 6-year ΔFEV 1 , with established CT gas-trapping and RadScore. Binary logistic regression determined associations for COPD classification and visual gas-trapping. Results 1111 participants were investigated ( n =234 never-smokers, n =325 at-risk, n =314 mild COPD, n =238 moderate-severe COPD). In separate models for baseline RV/TLC, FEV 1 /FVC, FEV 1 , and FEF 25–75 , ΔFEV 1 , COPD classification and visual gas-trapping, all CT gas-trapping and CT RadScore measurements were independently significant (p<0.05). When CT gas-trapping and CT RadScore were included in the same model, all model performance metrics improved significantly (p<0.05). Conclusion CT measures extracted from full-expiratory images that quantify the distribution, not just extent, of gas-trapping provide important information related to lung function and lung function decline in COPD. Summary Statement Full-expiratory CT texture-based radiomics improves model performance when used in combination with conventional gas-trapping measurements for lung function and lung function decline, COPD classification and presence of visual gas-trapping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".