Boundary plasma studies for a spherical tokamak with lithium walls
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Boundary plasma and plasma-material interactions are investigated for magnetised target fusion (MTF) applications. The General Fusion magnetised target fusion technology uses coaxial helicity injection (CHI) start-up which forms a spherical tokamak in a cavity with liquid lithium walls that will subsequently be compressed to fusion conditions Laberge, J. Fusion Energy (2019) The Plasma Injector 3 (PI3) experiment at General Fusion is a non-compressing experiment with solid lithium walls that studies the formation and quasi-steady state operation of a CHI spherical tokamak Carbajal et al. (2023). An explorative study is carried out for wall-limited versus diverted configurations for PI3 using the fluid edge transport code UEDGE. Experimental edge temperature and density profiles from triple Langmuir probes are used to establish realistic temperature and density profiles in UEDGE Rognlien et al. (1992) by adjusting the transport coefficients. In UEDGE, we model the wall-limited plasma via a thin limiter with various insertion depths. It is found that limiter depth and location are key parameters in determining radial profiles and sputtered lithium behaviour. Furthermore, it is found that the total sputtering of the limiter is significantly lower than the sputtering of the wall in some of the limiter configurations studied. Lithium ions and neutral behaviour are compared between limited and diverted configurations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it