MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407029863 · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2025.112244

Parental anxiety and catastrophizing in pediatric tonsillectomy pain control: A multivariate analysis

2025· article· en· W4407029863 on OpenAlexafffund
Ben Levy, Jennifer M. Siu, Brittany N. Rosenbloom, Mélanie Noël, Tanya Chen, Nikolaus E. Wolter

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Pain Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of CalgaryHospital for Sick ChildrenWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersHospital for Sick Children
KeywordsMedicineTonsillectomyAnxietyPain catastrophizingOdds ratioAdenoidectomyOddsPhysical therapyCohortLogistic regressionAnesthesiaChronic painPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parental anxiety and/or catastrophizing may bias the interpretation of children's pain and administration of analgesia post-tonsillectomy. We aimed to determine whether high levels of parental anxiety and/or catastrophizing impact child pain intensity interpretation and administration of analgesia. Child-parent dyads were recruited from a tertiary care institution between July 2017–December 2019. Preoperative parental anxiety and catastrophizing were assessed using self-report measures. Postoperative data on child and parent pain intensity, as well as analgesia use, were collected up to 2 weeks post-surgery. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to assess predictors of postoperative child pain intensity and analgesia use. Our cohort included 234 child-parent dyads. Median child age was 5 years (IQR, 4–6), and 9.0 % of children (n = 21) had a medical comorbidity. Both child- and parent-reported pain intensity were highest on postoperative day 2 (3.65 [SD = 3.08] and 3.67 [SD = 2.51], respectively). Parental catastrophizing did not predict analgesia use at home, although a minimal significant decrease in the odds of analgesia administration was observed on postoperative day 7 (OR 0.932, p = 0.017). Maximal parental anxiety did not predict higher odds of increased child postoperative pain intensity on any postoperative day. Parental catastrophizing prior to tonsillectomy has minimal predictive value for analgesia use postoperatively. Children may be successfully advocating for their own pain control as parental anxiety and catastrophizing do not appear to be unduly influencing analgesia administration. Future studies should explore the impact of parental anxiety on vulnerable pediatric populations who may be unable to self-advocate for pain management. • Parental catastrophizing has minimal predictive value for postoperative analgesia administration following tonsillectomy. • Parental anxiety is not predictive of child postoperative pain intensity following tonsillectomy. • Children may be successfully advocating for their own pain control following tonsillectomy. • Studies should explore the impact of parental anxiety on vulnerable patients who cannot self-advocate for pain management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologySame topicPediatric Pain Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207