Analysis of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Generated By Protoporphyrin IX
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for cancer treatment relies on the generation of cytotoxic singlet oxygen (1O2) in type II PDT. Hence, monitoring of 1O2 generation during PDT enables optimal treatment delivery to the tumor target with reduced off-target effects. Direct 1O2 observation by measuring its luminescence at 1270 nm remains challenging due to the very weak signal. This study presents 1O2 luminescence measurements using a time-resolved singlet oxygen luminescence detection system (TSOLD) applied to protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) in different solvents (ethanol and acetone) and biological media (bovine serum albumin and agarose-based solid phantom). The compact experimental setup includes a nanosecond diode laser with a function generator, a cuvette with photosensitizer solution, optical filtering and mirrors, an InGaAs single-photon avalanche diode detector, and time-tagger electronics. Increasing the concentration of PpIX in these media from 1 to 10 µg/g resulted in a 3–5 × increase in the 1O2 luminescence signal. Furthermore, increasing light scattering in the sample using Intralipid from 0.1 to 1% led to a decrease in the 1O2 luminescence signal and lifetime. These results confirm the marked effect of the microenvironment on the 1O2 signal and, hence, on the photodynamic efficacy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".