MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407030092 · doi:10.61838/kman.psynexus.2.2.3

Exploring the Psychological Well-being of Stay-at-Home Fathers

2024· article· en· W4407030092 on OpenAlexaff
Neşe Köse, Farhad Namjoo

Bibliographic record

VenueKMAN Counseling and Psychology Nexus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to explore the psychological well-being of stay-at-home fathers (SAHFs), focusing on their self-identity and role perception, the challenges they face, and the coping mechanisms they employ. A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews to gather data from 24 SAHFs. Participants were selected through purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation. The interviews were conducted either in-person or via video conferencing, lasting between 45 to 90 minutes. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using NVivo software. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes and patterns in the data, providing an in-depth understanding of the participants' experiences. The study identified three main themes: Identity and Role Perception, Challenges and Coping Mechanisms, and Social Support and Relationships. SAHFs experienced significant shifts in self-identity, moving from career-focused to fatherhood-centered roles. They faced various emotional challenges, including stress, anxiety, and social isolation, exacerbated by time management and financial pressures. Social support from spouses, peers, and community involvement played a crucial role in mitigating these challenges. The importance of robust support networks and community engagement was underscored, highlighting the need for tailored interventions to enhance the well-being of SAHFs. The psychological well-being of SAHFs is influenced by a complex interplay of identity shifts, societal perceptions, and the challenges of managing daily responsibilities. Social support emerges as a critical factor in promoting mental health and reducing feelings of isolation. This study contributes to the understanding of SAHFs' experiences and underscores the need for targeted support systems and policies to address their unique challenges. Future research should expand on these findings with larger, more diverse samples and explore the long-term impacts of being a SAHF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKMAN Counseling and Psychology NexusSame topicIntergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingFrench-language works237,207