MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of aerobic fitness on the validity of the Calera Research™ sensor to estimate core temperature during exercise

2025· article· en· W4407030956 on OpenAlexafffund
Jose Ignacio Priego‐Quesada, Dami C Adejuwon, Daniel A. Keir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thermal Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
FundersMinisterio de UniversidadesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAerobic exerciseVO2 maxIntraclass correlationHeart rateAerobic capacityCore temperaturePhysical fitnessPhysical therapyCore (optical fiber)Anaerobic exercisePillLimits of agreementMedicineAnimal scienceMathematicsInternal medicineStatisticsBiologyPhysicsPsychometricsBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Calera Research™ is a heat flux device advertised to estimate core temperature (Tc) during physical activity and is widely used by athletes in various sport disciplines. The device estimates Tc from skin temperature, heart rate, and heat flux, outcomes that can be affected by aerobic fitness. However, there is a relatively small body of literature exploring its validity and, specifically, how the device bias may be influenced by aerobic fitness. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Calera Research™ sensor compared with telemetric ingestible pills for estimating Tc and to determine whether aerobic fitness impacts accuracy. Twenty participants (10 females) performed a cycling-based ramp-incremental exercise test to volitional exhaustion in a temperature controlled environment (22 °C) during which Tc was measured directly from ingested pills (eCelsius performance system) and by the Calera device. Compared to the ingestible telemetric pills, the Calera device exhibited lower Tc values (95%CI[-0.2, -0.3 °C], p < 0.001) with an intraclass correlation of 0.47 and a bias of −0.3 ± 0.2 °C. Participants were divided into two groups (10 participants at each group) based on peak oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2peak ) (HL: high aerobic; LL: lower aerobic fitness). Throughout ramp-incremental exercise, HL had a lower heart rate (p < 0.001 and η 2 = 0.10; 95%CI[0.1, 17.2 bits/min]) and Tc measured by the ingestible pills (p < 0.001 and η 2 < 0.01, 95%CI[0.1, 0.3 °C]). However, there were no-between group differences for skin temperature and intraclass correlation values and bias were also similar. In conclusion, the estimation of Tc by Calera Research™ underestimated Tc by approximately 0.3 °C in a moderate thermal environment, but the intensity-dependent profile was similar to that of the ingestible pill method and was unaffected by aerobic fitness differences. • The Calera consistently underestimated core temperature (by ∼0.3ᵒC). • The underestimation magnitude increased in people with higher core temperature. • This core temperature estimation was not affected by the aerobic fitness status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thermal BiologySame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207