Velocity ratings and perceptual qualities of electrotactile stimulation of the foot sole are impacted by direction, stimulus interval, and cutaneous saltation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrotactile stimulation is a çmethod of activating the tactile system by bypassing cutaneous mechanoreceptors and exciting the cutaneous afferent endings directly. This method is of interest for its potential in wearable tactile augmentation technologies. The generation of meaningful electrotactile sensation could benefit cases of peripheral neuropathy or prosthesis. There are limitations in our understanding of an electrotactile stimulations' capacity to represent tactile sensibilities, and its susceptibility to missense. The spatiotemporal parameters of an electrotactile sequence were varied. The present work extends the assessment of subjective evaluations of localization, velocity, and descriptive qualities. We applied electrotactile pulses at three sites on the foot sole, using three patterns across these sites: toward the heel or toes. We tested at three interstimulus intervals (100 ms, 160 ms, 220 ms). Faster sequences produced higher velocity ratings. Sequence direction across the foot sole impacted velocity ratings-with heel-to-toe sequences demonstrating a higher velocity rating than toe-to-heel sequences. During faster sequences with site repetition, cutaneous saltation is likely causing missense during localization. The spatiotemporal missense did not impact velocity ratings. This indicates that certain aspects of electrotactile sequence perception, such as velocity, are preserved through tactile illusions. These findings may be used to increase the resolution of stimulating grids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".