MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407037890 · doi:10.2196/68863

Performance Improvement of a Natural Language Processing Tool for Extracting Patient Narratives Related to Medical States From Japanese Pharmaceutical Care Records by Increasing the Amount of Training Data: Natural Language Processing Analysis and Validation Study

2025· article· en· W4407037890 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yukiko Ohno, Tohru Aomori, Tomohiro Nishiyama, Riri Kato, Reina Fujiki, Haruki Ishikawa, Keisuke Kiyomiya, Minae Isawa, Mayumi Mochizuki, Eiji Aramaki, Hisakazu Ohtani

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNatural language processingNatural (archaeology)Natural languageNarrativeArtificial intelligenceLinguisticsHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Patients' oral expressions serve as valuable sources of clinical information to improve pharmacotherapy. Natural language processing (NLP) is a useful approach for analyzing unstructured text data, such as patient narratives. However, few studies have focused on using NLP for narratives in the Japanese language. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop a high-performance NLP system for extracting clinical information from patient narratives by examining the performance progression with a gradual increase in the amount of training data. METHODS: We used subjective texts from the pharmaceutical care records of Keio University Hospital from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019, comprising 12,004 records from 6559 cases. After preprocessing, we annotated diseases and symptoms within the texts. We then trained and evaluated a deep learning model (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers combined with a conditional random field [BERT-CRF]) through 10-fold cross-validation. The annotated data were divided into 10 subsets, and the amount of training data was progressively increased over 10 steps. We also analyzed the causes of errors. Finally, we applied the developed system to the analysis of case report texts to evaluate its usability for texts from other sources. RESULTS: -score also increased from 0.34 to 0.41 as the training dataset expanded from 1200 to 12,004 records. Performance was lower for extracting symptoms from case report texts compared with pharmaceutical care records, suggesting that this system is more specialized for analyzing subjective data from pharmaceutical care records. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully developed a high-performance system specialized in analyzing subjective data from pharmaceutical care records by training a large dataset, with near-complete saturation of system performance with about 3600 training records. This system will be useful for monitoring symptoms, offering benefits for both clinical practice and research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207