Memory-Enhancing and Anxiolytic Effects of the Rose of Jericho on Sleep Deprivation-Related Cognitive and Behavioral Changes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sleep is a crucial physiological phenomenon that enables the body to engage in restoration and rejuvenation. Remarkably, even limited periods of sleep deprivation (SD) can adversely affect cognitive functions such as memory retention, emotional regulation, data processing, and concentration. The Rose of Jericho (RoJ) has been considered more than a plant and has demonstrated potential therapeutic actions in childbirth, respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal disorders, and cancer. The effect of the RoJ on memory, cognition, and behavior has not yet been well-studied. OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to investigate the possible therapeutic effects of the RoJ on memory, cognition, behavior, and motor coordination in a rat model of SD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty male Wistar albino rats weighing 120-150 g were used in the present study. The rats were acclimatized and trained and then randomly divided into three groups: control (C), sleep-deprived (SD), and SD treated with RoJ (SD+RoJ). Spatial memory and learning were assessed using the Morris Water Maze (MWM) test, while anxiety-related behaviors were evaluated through the Elevated Plus Maze (EPM) test. The rotarod test was used to assess motor coordination. RESULTS: The study revealed significant behavioral and cognitive performance improvements with the SD+RoJ group across all the tests. In the MWM test, the SD group exhibited a marked increase in test duration (29.5 ± 3.57 sec) and a reduction in average speed (1.9 ± 0.3 cm/s) when compared to the C group (13.41 ± 1.57 sec and 5.9 ± 0.34 cm/s, respectively). Interestingly, the SD+RoJ group significantly reduced test duration (19.75 ± 3.36 sec) and improved rats' speed (6.06 ± 0.27 cm/s) compared to the SD group. The EPM test demonstrated that the SD group spent significantly less time in the open arms (16.2 ± 9.44 sec) than the C group (59.8 ± 3.29 sec). Interestingly, the SD+RoJ group significantly improved the time spent in the open arms (45.8 ± 11.64 sec). Moreover, the SD+RoJ group showed notable improvement in open-arm entries (7 ± 2.39) compared to the SD group (1.6 ± 0.81). In the Rotarod test, the SD group demonstrated a significant decline in latency to fall (44.2 ± 9.5 sec) compared to the C group (228.67 ± 35.44 sec). The SD+RoJ group exhibited a significantly longer falling latency (165 ± 28.77 sec) than the SD group. CONCLUSION: Treatment with the RoJ alleviated SD-dependent cognitive impairment, anxiety, and decline in motor coordination. Supplementation with the RoJ may offer potential therapeutic benefits, including boosting memory, improving cognition, reducing anxiety and depression, and enhancing motor coordination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".