Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis responsive to upadacitinib: A report of two cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Palmoplantar plaque psoriasis is more resistant to therapy compared to other phenotypes of psoriasis. To our knowledge, there are no reports of the efficacy of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for palmoplantar plaque psoriasis. Two adult females presented with more than 6-year histories of severe palmoplantar plaque psoriasis. The first patient had failed topical therapies, phototherapy, acitretin, and secukinumab. The second patient had failed topical therapies and systemic agents including alitretinoin, cyclosporine, apremilast, ustekinumab, ixekizumab, and risankizumab. Both cases were switched to upadacitinib 15 mg daily, with a complete response by 3 months of therapy and no adverse events. The first patient had slightly elevated fasting triglyceride and the second patient had elevated ALT, both of which are being monitored. This case series highlights the efficacy of upadacitinib in two patients with refractory palmoplantar plaque psoriasis. JAK1 inhibitors may be considered as third-line therapeutic options in patients with refractory palmoplantar plaque psoriasis and no contraindications to JAK inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".