MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407061461 · doi:10.35790/msj.v7i2.59509

Manajemen Sindrom Koroner Kronik: Laporan Kasus

2025· article· en· W4407061461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Starry H. Rampengan, Alvin Eliata Cahyono

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Scope Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute coronary syndromeInternal medicineChest painCardiologyPercutaneous coronary interventionMyocardial infarctionConventional PCI

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Over the last decades, the management of chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) has improved rapidly that contributes in the decreasing of cardiovascular mortality. After myocardial infarction, the patient’s condition can improve with the usage of reperfusion therapy with thrombolysis or primary angioplasty and preventive treatment with aspirin and antiplatelet agents, statin, beta-blockers, and renin-angiotensin antagonists. Moreover, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve the survival of patients suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We reported a 49-year-old man, who complained of chest pain for the last one year, which worsened with activity. One day before hospitalization, the chest pain worsened. The patient was diagnosed with CCS CCS (Chronic Coronary Syndrome Canadian Cardiovascular Society) II-III, GERD, hyponatremia, dyslipidemia, hyperuricemia, and dyspepsia. After further examination, a RF-CL of 20% (moderate) was obtained. A Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography examination was carried out resulting a positive ischemic response, then DCA-PCI was performed. The patient went home without any complaints. The management of this patient from diagnosis to therapy is in accordance with the ESC CCS 2024 guidelines. In conclusion, regarding the importance of acute chest pain management, patients with chest pain should not be underestimated and there are many modalities that can be used to confirm the diagnosis of chronic coronary syndromes. Keywords: chronic coronary syndrome; dobutamin stress echocardiography; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk factor-clinical likelihood Abstrak: Selama beberapa dekade terakhir, manajemen sindrom koroner kronis telah meningkat pesat yang menyebabkan mortalitas kardiovaskular telah menurun secara stabil. Kondisi pasien setelah infark miokard dapat menjadi lebih optimal dengan adanya terapi reperfusi dengan trombolisis atau angioplasti primer dan terapi pencegahan seperti aspirin dan agen antiplatelet lainnya, statin, beta-blocker, dan antagonis renin-angiotensin. Intervensi koroner perkutan (IKP) dapat meningkatkan kelangsungan hidup pasien yang mengalami sindrom koroner akut (SKA). Kami melaporkan seorang laki-laki berusia 49 tahun, dengan keluhan nyeri dada sejak 1 tahun terakhir, diperberat dengan aktivitas. Sehari sebelum masuk rumah sakit, nyeri dada dirasakan memberat. Pasien didiagnosis dengan sindroma koroner kronik CCS CCS (Chronic Coronary Syndrome Canadian Cardiovascular Society) II-III, GERD, hiponatremia, dislipidemia, hiperurisemia, dan dispepsia. Pada pemeriksaan lanjut, didapatkan RF-CL 20% (moderate), kemudian dilakukan pemeriksaan dobutamin stress echocardiography dan didapatkan hasil iskemik respons positif, sehingga dilanjutkan dengan IKP. Penatalaksanaan pasien ini sejak konfirmasi diagnosis sampai terapi telah sesuai dengan Guidelines ESC CCS 2024. Pasien dipulangkan dengan tidak ada keluhan. Simpulan kasus ini ialah terkait tatalaksana nyeri dada akut, pasien dengan nyeri dada tidak boleh diremehkan, dan telah banyak modalitas yang dapat digunakan untuk mendiagnosis sindroma koroner kronik. Kata kunci: sindrom koroner kronik; dobutamin stress echocardiography; intervensi koroner perkutan; risk factor-clinical likelihood

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Scope JournalSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207