MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407065010 · doi:10.1016/j.fct.2025.115291

Preclinical safety evaluation of SloIron CFTN-PS 5: A pea-derived ferritin product

2025· article· en· W4407065010 on OpenAlexaff
Bradley J. Lampe, Margitta Dziwenka, Vincent P Hackel

Bibliographic record

VenueFood and Chemical Toxicology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsTransAlta (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerritinChemistryMedicinePharmacologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ferritins are proteins present in plants and animals that are highly effective in storing iron and maintaining iron homeostasis. Iron deficiency anemia is a widespread nutritional disorder, and plant ferritins (phytoferritin) are potential sources of bioavailable iron with slow-release characteristics that prevent oxidative damage. These characteristics are related to receptor mediated endocytosis, the primary absorption mechanism in humans. However, the available toxicological data are insufficient to determine whether the use of phytoferritin as a nutritional supplement to enhance iron consumption in human populations is safe. Therefore, several GLP-compliant toxicology studies have been conducted with phytoferritin prepared from the seed of Psium sativum (trade name: SloIron CFTN-PS5). SloIron CFTN-PS5 was non-mutagenic and non-clastogenic in vitro and did not induce the formation of micronuclei in vivo. SloIron CFTN-PS5 was well-tolerated in a 90-day subchronic toxicity studies conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats at doses up to 1950 mg/kg bw/day. These findings suggest that the oral consumption of SloIron CFTN-PS5 is of low toxicological concern, with a 90-day oral subchronic No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1950 mg/kg-day, the highest dose tested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood and Chemical ToxicologySame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207