Effect of Bimekizumab on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Work Productivity in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: 1-Year Results From 2 Phase III Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the longer-term effect of bimekizumab up to 1 year on patient-reported symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and work productivity in patients with active PsA who were biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve or had inadequate response/intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi-IR). METHODS: BE OPTIMAL (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03895203; bDMARD-naïve patients) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; TNFi-IR patients) are phase III studies of subcutaneous bimekizumab 160 mg every 4 weeks. Both studies were double-blind and placebo-controlled to 16 weeks. Patients who completed week 52 of BE OPTIMAL or week 16 of BE COMPLETE were eligible for the open-label extension, BE VITAL (NCT04009499), during which all patients received bimekizumab. Patient-reported pain, fatigue, physical function, HRQOL, and work productivity are reported to week 52 or 40 (52/40) using individual study data for bimekizumab and placebo treatment arms. RESULTS: Bimekizumab-randomized patients demonstrated sustained mean improvements from baseline in patient-reported outcomes to week 52/40, including pain (visual analog scale [0-100 mm]: bDMARD-naïve -30.5; TNFi-IR -31.8), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale [0-52]: bDMARD-naïve 5.3; TNFi-IR 6.0), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [0-3]: bDMARD-naïve -0.34; TNFi-IR -0.39), and HRQOL (36-item Short Form Health Survey, physical component summary: bDMARD-naïve 8.1; TNFi-IR 8.4); placebo patients who switched to bimekizumab at week 16 demonstrated comparable levels of improvement from week 16 to week 52/40. Improvements in overall work impairment were sustained among bimekizumab-randomized patients to week 52. Similar trends were observed for absenteeism, presenteeism, and activity impairment. CONCLUSION: Bimekizumab treatment resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported symptoms, HRQOL, and work productivity up to 1 year in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with active PsA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".