MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407071882 · doi:10.1101/2025.01.30.25321383

Failing maternal-fetal tolerance in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (FaMaLE): a prospective cohort study for finding the molecular mechanisms behind pregnancy complications

2025· preprint· en· W4407071882 on OpenAlexaff
Wendy Dankers, Jikke van Ruitenbeek, Serife Asya Germe, Agner R Parra Sanchez, Magdolna Gaál

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersFoundation for Research in RheumatologyAmsterdam University Medical Centers
KeywordsMedicinePregnancyProspective cohort studyFetusCohortObstetricsImmunologyInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Pregnant women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of maternal complications and adverse fetal outcomes. These include preeclampsia, preterm birth and fetal growth restriction. Interestingly, this increased risk persists in subsequent pregnancies, whereas it decreases in healthy women due to the development of maternal-fetal tolerance. As maternal-fetal tolerance is crucial for a healthy pregnancy, we hypothesize that its failure contributes to the increased risk of pregnancy complications in women with SLE. Therefore, we initiated the FaMaLE study to investigate the failure of maternal-fetal tolerance in pregnant women with SLE. Methods and analysis In the FaMaLE study, women with SLE and healthy women are included in their first trimester of pregnancy (< 14 weeks gestational age (GA)) at Amsterdam UMC. Throughout the pregnancy, data on SLE disease activity, pregnancy course, and medication use are collected. Peripheral blood is collected once per trimester, within 48 hours before delivery and 5-12 weeks post-partum. In addition, the placenta is collected after delivery. Whole blood, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and placenta samples are freshly analyzed by flow cytometry to assess immune cell composition. The resulting data are analyzed in relation to SLE disease course, pregnancy course and pregnancy outcomes. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the Amsterdam UMC Medical Ethics Committee and all participating women will be asked to provide informed consent. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at scientific meetings and via patient organizations. STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES - A unique prospective longitudinal study design, featuring the collection of serum, plasma and PBMC throughout and after pregnancy, alongside placental cells and biopsies from the same participants. This is complemented by detailed clinical data on SLE disease course and pregnancy course, and outcomes. - Fresh flow cytometry analyses allow immediate assessment of cell composition in blood and placenta, without freeze/thawing effects - The study does not include pre-pregnancy collection of serum, plasma and PBMC; however detailed clinical data are collected during this period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→