Intersecting vulnerabilities: Health and wellbeing of older adults in Uganda during a global health crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Older adults faced high emotional distress during COVID-19. • Chronic inequities intersected with pandemic experiences to influence health and wellbeing. • Protective conditions unexpectedly increased emotional distress during the pandemic. • Social protections and mental health services can mitigate future disruptions. The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated vulnerabilities among older adults, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa where structural inequities shape access to essential resources. Older adults are among the most vulnerable populations globally, yet their experiences during the pandemic remain understudied in resource-limited settings. Drawing on feminist political ecology of health and necropolitics, this research examined how pre-existing disadvantages, pandemic-induced disruptions, and structural inequities shaped health and wellbeing. We analyzed a cross-sectional survey ( n = 288) of adults aged ≥60 years in rural Uganda in the acute phase of the pandemic (late 2021-early 2022), which documented access to essential resources to meet daily needs along with psychosocial health and wellbeing. Findings indicate some of the highest reported emotional distress (87 %) and low wellbeing (33). Contrary to expectations, being partnered or self-employed correlated with greater emotional distress, while WASH access indicators had limited influence on health outcomes. These patterns reflect how pandemic restrictions amplified household stresses and economic pressures, particularly for those with established social and economic resources, while limited WASH influence suggests acute pandemic stressors overshadowed chronic inadequacies. Satisfaction with government response also showed paradoxical effects, correlating with better psychosocial health but lower wellbeing, reflecting how interventions alleviated immediate anxieties while undermining economic stability. Overall, this research demonstrates how chronic structural inequities, rather than just acute emergencies, shape health outcomes among vulnerable populations. Aligned with the UN Research Roadmap, these findings suggest that addressing health inequities requires moving beyond emergency response toward systemic changes that enhance social protection and infrastructure access for older adults in resource limited settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".