Comparative assessment of hemostasis in septic patients and healthy controls using standard coagulation tests and whole-blood thromboelastometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is associated with dysregulation of procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic pathways. AIMS: To compare the measurements of coagulation activation, clot formation, stabilization, and lysis between rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and standard coagulation tests (SCTs) on patients with early sepsis (SP) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: This observational study included 30 SP and 30 HC. At study inclusion, SCTs and ROTEM analyses were conducted. A modified ROTEM with exogenous tPA was used to investigate fibrinolysis resistance. RESULTS: SP had longer prothrombin time, higher fibrinogen levels and lower platelet count compared to HC. On ROTEM, clotting initiation was longer in SP than in HC but median clotting time maintained within reference ranges. SP had higher maximum velocity of clot formation, clot firmness, elasticity, and platelet component than HC. Clot lysis indices (CLI) were higher in EXTEM and APTEM (without and with added tPA) in SP compared to HC. The difference in CLI between APTEM and EXTEM was lower for both native and tPA-spiked samples in SP compared with HC. CONCLUSIONS: While SCTs suggest SP are hypocoagulable, VET revealed normal coagulation initiation in more than 80 % of SP. Compared to HC, SP had increased clot propagation, firmness and elasticity, and decreased platelet-mediated clot retraction and lysis. In sepsis, VET provide more comprehensive information about hemostatic changes than SCTs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".