“False” False Tendon: Fatal Intramyocardial Dissecting Hematoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intramyocardial dissecting hematoma (IDH) is a rare complication that may emerge from myocardial infarction, thoracic injury, or percutaneous intervention. In the past, IDH was diagnosed through surgical intervention or postmortem autopsy. We present a case of a 70-year-old male with comorbidities who admitted to the intensive care unit after suffering out of hospital pulseless electrical activity cardiac arrest and obtained return of spontaneous circulation after chest compressions. Initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showed ST elevation in the anterolateral leads. Repeated ECG a few minutes later showed junctional rhythm bradycardia with a rate of 27 and serial changes of an anterolateral infarct were present and placed on percutaneous pacing with vasopressors. The troponin I peaked at 1.880. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) portrayed a hyperechoic mobile filamentous structure near the cardiac apex, which was thought to be a false left ventricular (LV) tendon initially. A repeat TTE with the use of an ultrasound enhancing agent (sulfur hexafluoride) revealed an apical neocavity with no contrast filling, suggestive of a large apical IDH within the LV. The patient expired because of cardiac arrest secondary to cardiogenic shock refractory to pressor support, with no autopsy performed. This case highlights an uncommon and timelier diagnostic modality of IDH in deference of more costly and prolonged imaging studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".