MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407086695 · doi:10.1175/jas-d-24-0113.1

Environmental Conditions Controlling the Morphology of Shallow Orographic Convection

2025· article· en· W4407086695 on OpenAlexafffund
Jialin Liu, Daniel J. Kirshbaum

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Atmospheric Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrographyOrographic liftMesoscale meteorologyTurbulencePrecipitationAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyConvectionGeologyTropical waveBoundary layerRange (aeronautics)MeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMechanicsPhysicsTropical cycloneMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Quasi-stationary rainbands capable of producing heavy localized precipitation have been observed over the Oregon Coastal Range and other mesoscale mountain ridges. These bands thus present an important forecasting problem, which is challenged by the inability of operational NWP models to accurately resolve them. To aid the prediction of these events, this study synthesizes an observational climatology with idealized large-eddy simulations of shallow convection over the Coastal Range. The climatology identified cases with banded and cellular morphologies over the Coastal Range and determined composite upstream soundings for each morphology. While prominent differences in these soundings included stronger low-level winds and dry static stability in the banded events, these differences alone did not fully determine the resulting cloud morphology in the simulations. Another key factor was the turbulence intensity in the impinging atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), which is partially controlled by the sea–air temperature difference over the eastern Pacific Ocean (ΔTSA). While banded events mostly exhibit ΔTSA < 0 and weak ABL turbulence, cellular events mostly exhibit the opposite. ABL turbulence was thus hypothesized to favor cells by disrupting the lee-wave circulations responsible for organizing the bands. A new parameter R was developed to predict cloud morphology based on the ratio of the TKE of transient turbulent velocity fluctuations to that of stationary lee-wave perturbations. This parameter accurately predicted the cloud morphology in numerous simulations with varying upstream flows and ΔTSA. It also provides a simple explanation for why the observed characteristics of banded events (stronger low-level winds and ABL stabilities, ΔTSA < 0) all favor band development. Significance Statement This study synthesizes observations and numerical simulations to determine the environmental conditions distinguishing quasi-stationary banded convection from transient cellular convection over the Oregon Coastal Range. The former morphology can concentrate heavy precipitation over narrow regions to greatly enhance flash-flooding risks. The results provide quantitative guidance for forecasters to aid their analysis of operational NWP forecasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Atmospheric SciencesSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207