MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407091626 · doi:10.5194/amt-18-569-2025

Validation of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO <sub>2</sub> measurements

2025· article· en· W4407091626 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Paul S. Jeffery, J. R. Drummond, C. T. McElroy, Kaley A. Walker, Jiansheng Zou

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric measurement techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsOzoneEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Launched aboard the Canadian SCISAT satellite in August 2003, the Measurement of Aerosol Extinction in the Stratosphere and Troposphere Retrieved by Occultation (MAESTRO) instrument has been measuring solar absorption spectra in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible part of the spectrum for more than 20 years. The UV-channel measurements from MAESTRO are used to retrieve profiles of ozone from the short-wavelength end of the Chappuis band (UV-ozone) and NO2, while measurements made in the visible part of the spectrum are used to retrieve a separate ozone (Vis-ozone) product. The latest ozone and NO2 profile products, version 4.5, have been released, and they initially cover the period from February 2004 to December 2023, although they will continue to be updated. The version 4.5 retrieval algorithm represents an improvement from previous versions, with changes including updated pressure and temperature input information, an improved algorithm for high-Sun reference spectrum calculation, improved Rayleigh scattering modelling, and the change to a Twomey–Tikhonov inversion algorithm from a Chahine relaxation technique. Due to the buildup of an unknown contaminant, the UV-ozone and NO2 products are only viable up to June 2009 for NO2 and December 2009 for UV-ozone. This study presents comparisons of the version 4.5 MAESTRO ozone and NO2 measurements with coincident (both spatially and temporally) measurements from an ensemble of 11 other satellite limb-viewing instruments. In the stratosphere, the Vis-ozone product was found to possess a small high bias, with stratosphere-averaged relative differences between 2.3 % and 8.2 %, although good agreement with the comparison datasets was found overall. A similar bias, albeit with slightly poorer agreement, is found for the UV-ozone product in the stratosphere, with the average stratospheric agreement between MAESTRO and the other datasets ranging from 2.8 % to 11.9 %. For NO2, general agreement with the comparison datasets is only found in the range from 20 to 40 km. Within this range, MAESTRO is found to have a low bias for NO2, and most of the datasets agree to within 27.2 %, although the average agreement ranges from 8.5 % to 43.4 %.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric measurement techniquesSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207