MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407095505 · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.12.023

Extended Risankizumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn’s Disease Who Did Not Achieve Clinical Response to Induction Treatment

2025· article· en· W4407095505 on OpenAlexaff
Remo Panaccione, Marc Ferrante, Iris Dotan, Julián Panés, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Peter Bossuyt, Silvio Danese, Alexandra Song, Jasmina Kalabic, Namita Joshi, Javier Zambrano, Yafei Zhang, W. Rachel Duan, Kristina Kligys, Marla C. Dubinsky, James O. Lindsay, Séverine Vermeire, Britta Siegmund, Peter M. Irving, Geert D’Haens

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAbbVie
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseCrohn diseaseInternal medicineIntensive care medicineGastroenterologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy and safety of extended treatment with risankizumab (RZB), an anti-interleukin-23 p19 monoclonal antibody, were evaluated in patients with moderate to severe Crohn's disease (CD) who did not achieve clinical response to 12 weeks (W) RZB induction treatment ('initial nonresponders'). METHODS: Initial nonresponders to intravenous (IV) RZB induction (600 mg or 1200 mg at W0, W4, and W8) were rerandomized 1:1:1 to receive extended blinded RZB treatment (1200 mg IV at W12, W16, and W20, or subcutaneous [SC] 180 mg or 360 mg at W12 and W20). Patients with clinical response to SC RZB at W24 ('delayed responders') continued their dose in FORTIFY. Clinical, endoscopic, and safety outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Most initial nonresponders achieved stool frequency (SF)/ abdominal pain score (APS) clinical response by W24 (76.2% [180 mg SC], 63.7% [360 mg SC], 62.3% [1200 mg IV]), whereas a subset also achieved W24 SF/APS clinical remission (43.0%, 45.1%, and 22.1%), endoscopic response (32.4%, 32.5%, and 40.5%), and endoscopic remission (25.1%, 18.0%, and 23.5%). Most delayed responders to SC RZB continued to demonstrate clinical response at FORTIFY W52 (56.7% [180 mg SC], 69.7% [360 mg SC]), along with SF/APS clinical remission (43.3% and 54.5%), endoscopic response (36.7% and 45.5%), and endoscopic remission (40.0% and 42.4%). Numerically greater efficacy was generally observed with 360 mg SC vs 180 mg SC. The safety profile of extended treatment was consistent with previously reported trials. CONCLUSIONS: Most initial nonresponders to IV RZB induction who received 12W of extended RZB treatment demonstrated improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes at W24. Improvements in patients who received SC RZB extended treatment were maintained during FORTIFY. Extended treatment was well tolerated with no new safety risks identified. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: MOTIVATE (Number: NCT03104413), ADVANCE (Number: NCT03105128), and FORTIFY (Number: NCT03105102).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207