Is <i>Bunomeryx</i> (Artiodactyla, Homacodontidae) an early tylopod? A re-evaluation of evidence from the otic region, and a clarification of some key anatomical terms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bunomeryx is an early North American artiodactyl commonly thought to be an ancestral tylopod. Much of the evidence for this relationship comes from the otic region. We can now elaborate on this evidence by using computed tomography scanning to reconstruct previously undescribed parts of the Bunomeryx otic region, including the bony labyrinth. Furthermore, a great deal of research has been conducted on artiodactyl petrosals since the petrosal of Bunomeryx was first described, providing an opportunity to compare this potentially pivotal taxon to other early artiodactyls and the early camelid Poebrotherium, a definitive tylopod. Our comparisons have revealed a need to update three anatomical terms: the subarcuate fossa, the mastoid fossa, and the ventromedial flange. We provide revised definitions along with morphological descriptions. Based on our comparisons, the otic region of Bunomeryx is broadly similar to most early artiodactyls, with the greatest similarity to Homacodon, another early North American artiodactyl. Many features thought to unite Bunomeryx with Tylopoda, such as a large subarcuate fossa, are widespread in these early taxa. Others, such as a ventromedial flange and an anteromedial tuberosity, may have evolved multiple times. The presence of a small, triangular internal acoustic meatus may link Bunomeryx to later branching tylopods such as Poebrotherium, but this morphology is also present in Homacodon. It appears that, rather than Bunomeryx having a derived tylopod morphology, camelids possess some plesiomorphic and potentially convergent characters. Bunomeryx may be an ancestral tylopod, but there is less evidence for this relationship than previously thought.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".