Multiple fertility restorer loci for cytoplasmic male sterility caused by <i>orf137</i> in tomato
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in plants is caused by incompatibility between nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic information. Fertility can be restored through the action of fertility restoration ( RF ) genes, which are usually present in the nucleus. CMS lines of tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum ) have been developed from asymmetric cell fusions, in these lines, cultivated tomato served as a nuclear donor and its wild relative, S. acaule , as a cytoplasm donor. Although RF genes are present in wild relatives of tomato, no genetic or genomic information on the RF genes is yet available. This study reports an RF genetic locus, RF1 , on chromosome 1 of S. pimpinellifolium LA1670 and S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme LA1673 that was revealed by bulked segregant analysis and sequencing. An additional RF locus, RF2 , was identified on chromosome 2 of LA1670. A transgenic approach identified two other candidate genes that also restored fertility. The genomic sequence of S. cheesmaniae LA0166 was assembled using high-fidelity, long-read sequencing technology. Sequence comparisons identified further candidate RF genes on chromosome 1 of S. cheesmaniae LA0166. These results suggested that multiple gene loci control the fertility restoration trait in wild relatives of tomato.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".