MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407103782 · doi:10.1038/s43856-024-00702-9

Gravity-based microfiltration reveals unexpected prevalence of circulating tumor cell clusters in ovarian and colorectal cancer

2025· article· en· W4407103782 on OpenAlexafffund
Anne Meunier, Javier Alejandro Hernández-Castro, Nicholas Chahley, Laudine Communal, Sara Kheireddine, Newsha Koushki, Nadia Davoudvandi, Sara Al Habyan, Benjamin Péant, Anthoula Lazaris, Andy Ng, Teodor Veres, Luke McCaffrey, Diane Provencher, Peter Metrakos, Anne‐Marie Mes‐Masson, David Juncker

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University Health CentreMcGill Genome CentreNational Research Council CanadaCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill University
FundersCIHR Skin Research Training CentreFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureGovernment of CanadaUniversité de MontréalCalifornia HIV/AIDS Research Program
KeywordsColorectal cancerOvarian cancerMicrofiltrationCancerOncologyMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchBiologyGeneticsMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are rare (a few cells per milliliter of blood) and mostly isolated as single-cell CTCs (scCTCs). CTC clusters (cCTCs), even rarer, are of growing interest, notably because of their higher metastatic potential, but very difficult to isolate. We introduce gravity-based microfiltration (GµF) for facile isolation of cCTCs using in-house fabricated microfilters and 3D printed cartridges. Optimal flow rate and pore size for cCTC isolation are determined by GµF of cultured ovarian single cells and cell clusters spiked in healthy blood. We perform GµF of blood from orthotopic ovarian cancer mouse models and characterize the morphological features of scCTCs and cCTCs, and the expression of molecular markers for aggressiveness. Finally, we analyze blood from 17 epithelial ovarian cancer patients with either localized or metastatic disease, and from 13 colorectal cancer liver metastasis patients. Here, we show that GµF optimized for cell cluster isolation captures cCTCs from blood while minimizing unwanted cluster disaggregation, with ~85% capture efficiency. We detect cCTCs in every patient, with between 2–100+ cells. We find cCTCs represent between 5–30% of all CTC capture events, and 10-80% of the CTCs are clustered; remarkably, in 10 patients, most CTCs are circulating not as scCTCs, but as cCTCs. GµF uncovers the unexpected prevalence and frequency of cCTCs including sometimes very large ones in epithelial ovarian cancer patients, and motivates additional studies to uncover their properties and role in disease progression. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are cancer cells that have moved from the cancer tumor itself into the bloodstream. CTCs are considered responsible for cancers spreading from the place they initially start to grow to other parts of the body, a process called metastasis. CTCs can be found as single cells or as clusters of cells, but clusters have remained elusive. We developed a way to capture clusters of CTCs and use it to isolate them from 17 people with ovarian cancer and 13 people with colorectal cancer which had spread to their liver. We find clusters of CTCs in all the cancer patients. Our study highlights the prevalence of these cell clusters, and our isolation method could be used to study them further, as well as potentially diagnose and monitor the impact of therapy in the future. Meunier et al. explore circulating tumor cell (CTC) population identification in ovarian and colorectal cancer. Utilization of optimized gravity-based microfiltration captures both single and clustered CTCs in animal models and patient samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.398

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications MedicineSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207