Pyrrolizine- and Indolizine-Derived Spirooxindoles: Synthesis, Antibacterial Activity and Inverse Docking Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spirooxindoles are a family of heterocyclic compounds which bear the oxindole nucleus in their structures, which have a considerable pharmaceutical potential and which have been linked to various drugs for the treatment of diverse diseases. In this work, a wide variety of spirooxindoles bearing a pyrrolizinic nucleus were obtained by a 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between substituted isatins, trans-3-benzoyl acrylic acid and L-proline. In this approach, the target products 9a–m were obtained in 40–86% yields under heating to reflux in methanol over 2 h. Similarly, spirooxindoles containing an indolizinic nucleus 11a–j were obtained in 45–69% yields by switching L-proline for pipecolic acid under heating to reflux in acetonitrile for 8 h. The antibacterial activity of the obtained products was evaluated against P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, S. aureus, and N. gonorrhoeae, also including an inverse docking analysis. Results show that 9f and 11i, were the most active compounds against S. aureus, while compounds 9d and 9m displayed the higher activity against N. gonorrhoeae. Inverse docking analysis showed that compounds 9b, 11a 11e, and 11i displayed high affinity to the target protein 6TYM and 7Q6S, which are involved in biological pathways of diverse cancer and Parkinson diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it