From Value to Action: Exploring How Value Perception and Satisfaction Shape Behavioral Intentions in Folk Museum Tourism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the demand perspective, tourists’ value perceptions of folk museum tourism and their behavioral intentions are pivotal for the sustainable and healthy development of the burgeoning folk culture tourism sector. These factors not only shape the growth of the industry but also play a crucial role in the preservation and dissemination of Chinese folk culture. This paper reports an empirical survey of 201 tourists, using a revised scale adapted from previous research. A structural equation model was developed to analyze the relationships among tourists’ value perception, satisfaction, and behavioral intention, focusing on visitors to folk museums and scenic spots. The results reveal: 1) value perception has a significant and direct positive effect on satisfaction; 2) satisfaction directly and positively influences behavioral intention; 3) value perception exerts a significant positive influence on behavioral intention, both directly and indirectly; and 4) satisfaction acts as a mediator between value perception and behavioral intention. These findings provide actionable insights for promoting folk museum tourism and advancing cultural heritage preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".