MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407114492 · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4898

Neuromodulation for Children With Hemiparesis and Perinatal Stroke

2025· article· en· W4407114492 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alicia Hilderley, Mary Dunbar, John Andersen, Darcy Fehlings, Megan J. Metzler, Helen L. Carlson, Ephrem Zewdie, Jacquie Hodge, Kathleen O’Grady, Lisa Carsolio, Nomazulu Dlamini, Adrianna Giuffre, Lauran Cole, Hsing‐Ching Kuo, Anna Bourgeois, Asha Hollis, Meghan Maiani, Patrick Ciechanski, Zeanna Jadavji, Brandon T. Craig, Dion Kelly, Joanna Renée Grandinetti Keough, James G. Wrightson, Linda Fay, Lauren Switzer, Michael Sametz, Brian L. Brooks, Maryna Yaskina, Jesse Batara, Michael D. Hill, Adam Kirton

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenAlberta Health ServicesWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalUniversity of TorontoHotchkiss Brain InstituteUniversity of CalgaryGlenrose Rehabilitation HospitalAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsyMedicineStroke (engine)Physical therapyRandomized controlled trialHemiparesisGross Motor Function Classification SystemPopulationTranscranial direct-current stimulationPediatric strokePhysical medicine and rehabilitationBrain stimulationPediatricsStimulationSurgeryIschemic strokeInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Current upper-extremity therapies provide inconsistent outcomes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Noninvasive brain stimulation, specifically transcranial direct current stimulation, may enhance motor gains when combined with therapy. Objective: To determine whether the addition of neurostimulation to upper-extremity therapy enhances motor function in children with perinatal stroke and unilateral cerebral palsy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled phase 3 trial was conducted from July 2017 through March 2023. Investigators, treating therapists, outcome assessors, parents, and participants were blinded to intervention allocation. The study took place at 3 tertiary care Canadian pediatric rehabilitation hospitals. From a population-based sample of children 6 to 18 years old with perinatal stroke and disabling unilateral cerebral palsy, 196 children were approached and 107 were excluded. Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned in permuted blocks of 2 (1:1) to receive daily sham or cathodal stimulation to the contralesional motor cortex during 10 days of high-dose, child-centered intensive upper-extremity therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were changes from baseline to 6 months posttherapy in affected hand function and attainment of child-identified functional goals assessed by the Assisting Hand Assessment and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Safety was assessed, including any decrease in the function of either hand. Analysis was intention to treat. Results: Eighty-nine children were enrolled with 45 randomized to sham (62% male, 38% female; mean [SD] age, 10.7 [2.8] years) and 44 to stimulation (52% male, 48% female; mean [SD] age, 10.7 [2.1] years). Eighty-three participants had complete outcome data (42 sham, 41 stimulation). High proportions of children in both groups demonstrated significant functional gains sustained at 6 months (P < .001) with large effect size (Cohen d > 1). There were no differences between groups for mean (SD) change in hand function (5.2 [5.3] vs 4.6 [5.7]; P = .63) or goal attainment (3.0 [2.0] vs 3.6 [2.3]; P = .25). Procedures were safe and well tolerated with no serious adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, results showed that patient-centered intensive motor learning programs could produce marked and sustained improvements in upper-extremity function in children with perinatal stroke and unilateral cerebral palsy. The addition of 1 milliampere contralesional motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation did not improve outcomes compared with sham stimulation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03216837.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA NeurologySame topicCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersFrench-language works237,207