MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407116126 · doi:10.1142/s0219876225500057

Evaluating Microstructural Characteristics of Aluminum–Silicon Carbide Nanomixtures: Application of Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Analysis

2025· article· en· W4407116126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon carbideMaterials scienceConvolutional neural networkNano-AluminiumGraphSiliconComputer scienceMetallurgyComposite materialArtificial intelligenceTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanomixes of aluminum and silicon carbide (Al–SiC) are sophisticated composite materials with better mechanical qualities, such as increased stiffness and strength. The microstructural properties of an aluminum matrix, such as grain size, phase distribution, and interfacial bonding, can be greatly influenced by the addition of silicon carbide nanoparticles. Achieving homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles and preserving robust interface bonding while striking a balance between mechanical strength and ductility present challenges. This paper proposes a hybrid approach for evaluating the microstructural characteristics of Aluminum–Silicon Carbide Nanomixtures. The proposed hybrid method combines a Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network (STGCNN) and Ali Baba and Forty Thieves Optimization (AFTO) and is usually referred to as the AFTO-STGCNN method. The main objective of the proposed method indicates the smallest aluminum matrix crystallite size and the maximum lattice strain can be achieved by modifying the process parameters. The AFTO approach is utilized to optimize the process parameters producing the minimum crystallite size and the maximum lattice strain of the Al matrix. The STGCNN technique predicts the characteristics of the Al/SiC nanocomposite. The proposed AFTO-STGCNN technique runs in the MATLAB platform and is compared to perform with the various existing methods. By this, the proposed technique achieves an error of 0.1%. But, the existing techniques, like Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Growth Optimizer Algorithm (GOA), and Multi-objective Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (MOGOA) attain the error of 0.3%, 0.2%, and 0.6%, respectively. Finally, this work demonstrates that the proposed strategy for minimizing error and enhancing performance in evaluating the microstructural properties of aluminum–silicon carbide nanomixtures is feasible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it