MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407128605 · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3534836

Enhancing the Collaborative Decision-Making Performance of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles: A Multi-Modal Failure-Aware Graph Representation Approach

2025· article· en· W4407128605 on OpenAlexaff
Qi Liu, Yujie Tang, Xueyuan Li, Guodong Du, Zirui Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModalComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)GraphTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, graph reinforcement learning (GRL)-based methods have demonstrated superior performance in solving decision-making issues. However, existing GRL-based methods encounter challenges in adequately integrating driving environment information and accurately capturing vehicular interactions. Resolving these issues is crucial for enhancing the safety and efficiency of intelligent transportation systems. To address these challenges, this paper presents a novel multi-modal failure-aware graph representation (MM-FA-GR) approach. The objective is to enhance the completeness and stability of graph representation techniques in the GRL-based setting, thereby improving the decision-making performance of CAVs operating in mixed autonomy traffic. Initially, a risk assessment invariant feature extractor (RA-IFE) is introduced to efficiently and selectively aggregate vehicle driving features into the node feature matrix. Subsequently, a multi-modal interaction model (MIM) is developed to comprehensively represent the mutual effects among vehicles and construct a multi-dimensional adjacency matrix. Moreover, a dynamic failure model (DFM) is incorporated to assess the sensing and communication failures of CAVs, enhancing the model’s robustness in non-ideal driving environments. Finally, a GRL model is established to solve the optimized driving strategies for CAVs. The proposed MM-FA-GR method has large potential to advance the graph representation technology, thereby enhancing decision-making performance in mixed autonomy traffic and improving robustness in non-ideal driving conditions. Comprehensive experiments are conducted with three typical traffic scenarios. Results show that our proposed MM-FA-GR method outperforms several baselines regarding safety, efficiency, and stability, highlighting the effectiveness of the core components within the proposed method. Moreover, the quantitative experiment validates the generalization capability of the proposed method in addressing the decision-making challenges of CAVs across diverse scenarios and traffic densities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.900

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207