MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407141704 · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01598

Crystal Structures of Three Polymorphs of Cs<sub>3</sub>ScF<sub>6</sub> by Means of Solid-State NMR, X-Ray, and Neutron Diffraction

2025· article· en· W4407141704 on OpenAlexaff
Aydar Rakhmatullin, Graham King, Мaxim S. Моlokeev, Ilya B. Polovov, Konstantin V. Maksimtsev, Emmanuelle Suard, Rinat Bakirov, František Šimko, Catherine Bessada, Mathieu Allix

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryOffice of ScienceMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationUral Federal UniversityVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCrystallographyNeutron diffractionCrystal structureSolid-stateSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceChemistryMaterials scienceDiffractionCrystal (programming language)X-ray crystallographyNuclear magnetic resonancePhysical chemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three polymorphs were found to exist for Cs 3 ScF 6 in the room temperature range of up to 280 °C. Two phase transitions were identified by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses at 92 and 196 °C upon heating. In situ high-temperature solid-state NMR, synchrotron and laboratory X-ray diffraction, and neutron powder diffraction were used for structural characterization. The crystal structure of the high-temperature (γ) phase adopts the cubic Fm 3̅ m ( Z = 4) space group with a = 9.6048(7) Å at 250 °C. The other two polymorphs, α and β, have tetragonal symmetry with space groups I 4 1 / a (Z= 80) and I 4/ m (Z= 10), and lattice parameters are a = 21.15222(6) Å, c = 38.21648(8) Å and a = 15.0401(2) Å, c = 9.6341(2) Å at RT and 150 °C, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystal Growth & DesignSame topicInorganic Fluorides and Related CompoundsFrench-language works237,207