Publisher Correction: A post-hoc analysis of risk factors for poor quality of life after surgical treatment of spondylodiscitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
References 14 – 25 were omitted and are listed below. 14. Aagaard, T., Roed, C., Dahl, B. & Obel, N. Long-term prognosis and causes of death after spondylodiscitis: A Danish nationwide cohort study. Infect. Dis. 48 , 201–208 https://doi.org/10.3109/23744235.2015.1103897 (2016). 15. Ukon, Y. et al. Preoperative risk factors affecting outcome in surgically treated pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Glob. Spine J. 13 https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682221077918 (2023). 16. Johnsen, L. G. et al. Comparison of the SF6D, the EQ5D, and the oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc disease. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 14 , 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-148/FIGURES/4 (2013). 17. Power, J. D. et al. Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry. Spine J. 23 , 1323–1333 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPINEE.2023.05.001 (2023). 18. Tonosu, J. et al. The normative score and the cut-off value of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Eur. Spine J. 21 , 1596–1602 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00586-012-2173-7/FIGURES/4 (2012). 19. Mannion, A. F. et al. What level of symptoms are patients with adult spinal deformity prepared to live with? A cross-sectional analysis of the 12-month follow-up data from 1043 patients. Eur. Spine J. 29 , 1340–1352 https://doi.org/10.1007/S00586-020-06365-Z/TABLES/6 (2020). 20. Giordan, E., Marton, E., Scotton, G. & Canova, G. Outcomes and risk factors for spontaneous spondylodiscitis: Case series and meta-analysis of the literature. J. Clin. Neurosci. 68 , 179–187 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOCN.2019.06.040 (2019) 21. Akiyama, T. et al. Incidence and risk factors for mortality of vertebral osteomyelitis: a retrospective analysis using the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database. BMJ Open 3 , e002412 https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2012-002412 (2013). 22. Veljanoski, D. et al. Spinal infections in the north-east of Scotland: a retrospective analysis. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 105 , 428–433 https://doi.org/10.1308/RCSANN.2022.0062 (2023). 23. Sircar, K. et al. Risk factors for neurologic deficits in patients with spinal epidural abscess: an analysis of one-hundred-forty cases. Glob Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231194467 (2023). 24. Ross, J. S. et al. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar discectomy: magnetic resonance evaluation. Neurosurgery . 38 , 855–863 (1996). 25. Sircar, K. et al. evaluation of classification systems and their correlation with clinical and quality-of-life parameters in patients with surgically treated spondylo. (2023).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".