MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407150502 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093711

Strength training for osteoporosis prevention during early menopause (STOP-EM): a pilot study protocol for a single centre randomised waitlisted control trial in Canada

2025· article· en· W4407150502 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Christina J Alexander, Leah Kaluta, Patrick W Whitman, Emma O. Billington, Lauren A. Burt, Leigh Gabel

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyMenopauseOsteoporosisRandomized controlled trialQuality of life (healthcare)Intervention (counseling)Internal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Women lose up to 10% of their bone mass around menopause and the decade following. There is a need for proactive approaches to preserve bone mass and quality around menopause. Existing work has found that high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT) can improve bone and muscle measures in late postmenopausal women. However, this has not been investigated in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women who are in the midst of the menopausal transition. Methods and analysis This study is a 9-month randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating a HiRIT programme in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women. The primary objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of HiRIT in 40 perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women (45–60 years). Participants will be randomised 1:1 into a supervised HiRIT exercise intervention and waitlisted control. The primary outcomes are recruitment, retention and adherence to the exercise intervention. Secondary outcomes include bone (bone mineral density, microarchitecture and strength), muscle (mass, strength and power), physical function (balance and aerobic fitness) and quality of life measures. Feasibility will be assessed based on a priori criterion for success and secondary outcomes will be assessed via multiple linear regressions. The study will be considered feasible if>50% of interested and eligible participants are recruited, if there is>60% adherence to the two times per week, 9-month exercise intervention and if at least 65% of the sample complete the final study visit . Feasibility outcomes will be used to inform a larger, future trial aimed at identifying the efficacy of the exercise intervention for improving various health outcomes, including bone density and muscle mass . Secondary exploratory outcomes will provide insight into the effect of exercise on muscle and bone in perimenopausal and early postmenopausal women. Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board of the University of Calgary REB22-1632. The results of this study will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in academic journals. Trail registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05961371 . (Protocol V.1.2, 28 September 2023)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.142
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicBone health and osteoporosis research→French-language works237,207→