MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407150510 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089460

Examining the association between child development and parental mental health after preterm birth-related stress: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis protocol

2025· review· en· W4407150510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kirsten S. Muller, Gerbrich E. van den Bosch, Celina E. Henke, Joost G. Daams, Lotte Haverman, Cornelieke S H Aarnoudse-Moens

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfant Development and Preterm Care
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMental healthMeta-analysisPsycINFOPediatricsChild developmentCochrane LibrarySystematic reviewMEDLINEPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Preterm infants born before 32 weeks of gestation are generally admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) to receive life-saving treatment, resulting in early exposure to stressful events. Yet, NICU admission is not only stressful for the infant but can also have a long-lasting negative impact on parental mental health, who may worry about their child. Parental mental health problems might affect child development through parental behaviour and the parent-infant relationship. Simultaneously, adverse child development after preterm birth can (further) elevate parental stress and mental health problems, straining parental behaviour, the parent-infant relationship and child development. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the association between preterm-born children's development (<32 weeks' gestation) and parental mental health after preterm birth-related stress following NICU admission at any point in time. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be performed and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A concept-based search on preterm birth, child development and parental mental health is performed using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library on 22 March 2024. Eligible are studies with original results on the association between child development after preterm birth (<32 weeks' gestation) and parental mental health. Independent reviewers will screen the articles, assess study quality using a Newcastle-Ottawa or Cochrane tool and determine the quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Meta-analyses are planned on the association between child development and parental mental health after preterm birth. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The results will enhance knowledge of the association between child development and parental mental health after preterm birth-related stress following NICU admission. This might lead to adjustments in follow-up care, optimising outcomes for infants and parents. Findings will be published in an international, peer-reviewed ad open-access journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024518307.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.050
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.074
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.264

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0500.074
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0350.034
Bibliometrics0.0150.013
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicInfant Development and Preterm CareFrench-language works237,207