MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407166487 · doi:10.1007/s44395-025-00002-8

Insilico, network pharmacology and neural network studies on Sida acuta Burm f.- based phytochemicals targeting NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase

2025· article· en· W4407166487 on OpenAlexaff
Abel Kolawole Oyebamiji, Sunday Adewale Akintelu, Oluwakemi Ebenezer, E. T. Akintayo, Cecilia O. Akintayo, Moriam Dasola Adeoye, A. Peter, Amel Elbasyouni

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOxidoreductaseChemistryPharmacologyBiologyTraditional medicineBiochemistryMedicineEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The biochemical activities of phytochemicals obtained from S. acuta Burm f. have been described in several forms by various scientists globally. This work has revealed the antimalarial activities of S. acuta Burm f. using various methods such as density functional theory method, induced fit docking technique, quantitative structure activities relationship (QSAR) via neural network approach and pharmacokinetics studies using ADMETLab software. Compound F10 showed a stronger ability to interact in terms of HOMO energy and energy gap while Compound F12 exhibited a high tendency to accept electrons from nearby compounds. Furthermore, compound F13 demonstrated greater potential to inhibit NADH-Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase. We observed that the derivatives in F10, F12 and F13 enhanced the reactivity and inhibiting activities of the parent compound. The prediction of binding affinity for compounds F1 to F16 using neural network was found to be accurate and dependable. Also, ADMET study was executed and reported appropriately. Our research could pave the way for the creation of a library of effective phytochemicals from S. acuta Burm f -based drugs with potential anti-malaria activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.196
Threshold uncertainty score0.761

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover Pharmaceutical SciencesSame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207