Countering the Wave of Democratic Backsliding and the Crisis of Democracy in West Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While the early 1990s ushered in a period of democratic transition in African countries, the last decade has witnessed what many observers have called the process of democratic backsliding in many parts of West Africa. This article examines and analyses some of the main causes of democratic retrenchment in the West Africa sub-region and how to address them. The main argument in this article is that various constraints and challenges, such as the increasing return of the military in politics, electoral manipulations, constitutional reforms to benefit incumbents and the lack of economic dividends for citizens, are undermining the democratic progress initially made in the 1990s. Thus, addressing the challenges that lead to military intervention, including poor socioeconomic conditions, would go a long way in stemming the tide of democratic backsliding in West Africa. Additionally, ensuring increasing trust in institutions such as the judiciary, media, electoral management bodies and the electoral system, coupled with an increasing role for civil society organizations in the political environment, would help combat democratic backsliding in the sub-region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".