Mitochondrial Transplantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hepatoprotective effects of mitochondrial transplantation (MTx) in a murine liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) model. BACKGROUND: Sequential liver ischemia, followed by reperfusion (I/R), is a pathophysiological process underlying hepatocellular injury in a number of clinical contexts, such as hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation, major elective liver surgery, and organ transplantation. A unifying pathogenic consequence of I/R is mitochondrial dysfunction. Restoration of mitochondria through transplantation (MTx) has emerged as a potential therapeutic in I/R. However, its role in liver I/R and its mechanisms of action remain poorly defined. METHODS: We investigated the hepatoprotective effects of MTx in an in vivo mouse model of liver I/R and used in vivo imaging and various knockout and transgenic mouse models to determine the mechanism of protection. RESULTS: We found that I/R-induced hepatocellular injury was prevented by MTx, as measured by plasma ALT, AST, and liver histology. In addition, I/R-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine release (IL-6, TNFα) was dampened by MTx, and anti-inflammatory IL-10 was enhanced. Moreover, MTx lowered neutrophil infiltration into both the liver sinusoids and lung bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, suggesting a local and distant reduction in inflammation. Using in vivo intravital imaging, we found that I/R-subjected Kupffer cells (KCs), rapidly sequestered transplanted mitochondria, and acidified mitochondria within lysosomal compartments. To specifically interrogate the role of KCs, we depleted KCs using the diphtheria toxin-inducible Clec4f/iDTR transgenic mouse, then induced I/R, and discovered that KCs are necessary for the beneficial effects of MTx. Finally, we induced I/R in the complement receptor of the immunoglobulin (CRIg) superfamily knockout mice and found that CRIg was required for mitochondria capture by KCs and mitochondria-mediated hepatoprotection. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we demonstrated that CRIg-dependent capture of mitochondria by I/R-subjected KCs is a hepatoprotective mechanism in vivo . These data progress knowledge on the mechanisms of MTx and open new avenues for clinical translation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".