MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407196765 · doi:10.15173/glj.v16i1.6075

Bogliaccini, J.A. (2024) Empowering Labour: Leftist Approaches to Wage Policy in Unequal Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781-0094335-25 240 pp. US$105.00 (hardcover).

2025· article· en· W4407196765 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pablo Pérez Ahumada

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Labour Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeft-wing politicsWagePolitical sciencePolitical economyEconomic historyEconomicsLabour economicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empowering Labour presents a meticulous analysis of the political dynamics that shape how and when centre-left governments employ wage policy as a pre-distributive strategy to promote equality and inclusion.The book's central argument, articulated in Chapter 2, is that the form and scope of wage policies are determined by two primary factors: the degree of unity between Left parties and labour's political legitimacy.These factors, in turn, are shaped by the long-term strategies of elites toward labour.Such strategies create path dependencies, influencing "differential opportunities for further options down the road" (p.2).The empirical evidence supporting this argument is drawn from a comparative study of Chile, Portugal and Uruguay.Through diverse sources -including archival materials, documents from labour unions, business associations and state institutions, as well as interviews with key informants such as labour leaders, employers, state officials and experts -Bogliaccini demonstrates how these countries exemplify three qualitatively distinct approaches to combining predistributive instruments with redistribution.The first part of this historical and causal account, presented in Chapter 3, explores how elites in these countries developed divergent strategies toward labour inclusion in the early 20th century.Chilean elites adopted a strategy of "elite-based contention", while Portuguese and Uruguayan elites pursued "controlled coordination" and "consociationalism", respectively.These strategies fostered distinct political practices -such as labour recognition, representation and participation in representative associations -that defined the degree of "empowered inclusion" of labour.Although none of these strategies survived the neoliberal and post-authoritarian transitions intact, Bogliaccini persuasively argues that they remain resilient, continuing to shape the power constellations between labour and capital.For instance, this historical legacy explains why labour legislation in Chile is notably more labour-repressive than in Portugal or Uruguay.The second part of the analysis, detailed in Chapter 4, examines the critical role of Left unity in determining the use of wage policy as a predistributive instrument.Bogliaccini argues that unified Left parties are more likely to moderate labour activism -such as wage militancy -thereby increasing the likelihood of employing wage policy (for example, Uruguay).Conversely, when the Left is fragmented, governments face greater challenges in managing activism and are less inclined to use wage policy, relying instead on minimum wage adjustments and redistributive policies to address inequality (for example, Chile).Bogliaccini's findings underscore the causal primacy of Left unity over two other sources of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Labour JournalSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207