MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407205139 · doi:10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.01.004

A Canadian Experience With a Percutaneous Microaxial Ventricular Assist Device in Children With Cardiogenic Shock

2025· article· en· W4407205139 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bhavikkumar Langanecha, Alyssa Power, Rachel D. Vanderlaan, Osami Honjo, Oshri Zaulan, Andrea Maurich, Rajiv Chaturvedi, Aamir Jeewa

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiogenic shockPercutaneousCardiologyVentricular assist deviceMedicineInternal medicineShock (circulatory)ImpellaMyocardial infarctionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The experience of a percutaneous microaxial (Impella) left ventricular assist device in children with cardiogenic shock is limited. The primary objective of this study was to review our institutional clinical outcomes of Impella use in children with cardiogenic shock. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of all adult-sized children who underwent Impella implantation from June 2019 to December 2024. Clinical outcomes, hemodynamics, and device complication data were collected. Results: A total of 7 patients (female = 4) with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 15 years (14.5, 16.5 years) and a median weight of 50.9 kg (46.5, 59.85 kg) underwent Impella insertion during the study period. Five patients underwent Impella insertion for hemodynamic support and 2 for left ventricular decompression while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. The underlying cardiac diagnoses were dilated cardiomyopathy (4 of 7), myocarditis (2 of 6), and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with presumed myocarditis (1 of 7). The median (IQR) duration of support was 5 days (2, 7 days). The median (IQR) duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay was 13 days (10.5, 19 days) and 23 days (15, 54 days), respectively. Three patients were ultimately bridged to a durable ventricular assist device, and 2 patients had recovery of myocardial function. One patient developed significant aortic regurgitation, which necessitated device explantation and conversion to central ECMO after 38 hours of support, and one patient had withdrawal of life-sustaining measures due to significant brain injury unrelated to Impella. Conclusions: There is increasing use of percutaneous microaxial pumps for supporting children in cardiogenic shock and left ventricle decompression on ECMO support. This report identifies the initial Canadian experience as an addition to the mechanical circulatory support armamentarium.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC Pediatric and Congenital Heart DiseaseSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207