The Effect of Ultrasound Image Pre-Processing on Radiomics Feature Quality: A Study on Shoulder Ultrasound
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radiomics, the extraction of quantitative features from medical images, has shown great promise in enhancing diagnostic and prognostic models, particularly in CT and MRI. However, its application in ultrasound (US) imaging, especially in musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging, remains underexplored. The inherent variability of ultrasound, influenced by operator dependency and various imaging settings, presents significant challenges to the reproducibility of radiomic features. This study aims to identify whether commonly used image pre-processing methods can increase the reproducibility of radiomics features, increasing the quality of analysis. This is performed with shoulder calcific tendinopathy as a case study. Ultrasound images from 84 patients with rotator cuff calcifications were retrospectively analysed. Three pre-processing techniques-Histogram Equalization, Standard CLAHE, and Advanced CLAHE-were applied to adjust image quality. Manual segmentation of calcifications was performed, followed by the extraction of 849 radiomic features. The reproducibility of these features was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), comparing results across pre-processing methods within the dataset. The Advanced CLAHE pre-processing method consistently yielded the highest ICC values, indicating superior reproducibility of radiomic features compared to other methods. Wavelet-transformed features, particularly in the GLCM and GLRLM subgroups, demonstrated robust reproducibility across all pre-processing techniques. Shape features, however, continued to show lower reproducibility. Advanced CLAHE pre-processing significantly enhances the reproducibility of radiomic features in ultrasound imaging of calcifications. This study underscores the importance of pre-processing in achieving reliable radiomic analyses, particularly in operator-dependent imaging modalities like ultrasound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".