MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407223807 · doi:10.1128/aem.02036-24

Bumble bee gut microbial community structure differs between species and commercial suppliers, but metabolic potential remains largely consistent

2025· article· en· W4407223807 on OpenAlexafffund
Michelle Hotchkiss, Alexandre J. Poulain, Jessica R. K. Forrest

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyPollinatorGut floraPhylotypeMetagenomicsEcologyTaxonRange (aeronautics)ZoologyPhylogeneticsPollinationGeneticsPollenGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Bumble bees are key pollinators for natural and agricultural plant communities. Their health and performance are supported by a core gut microbiota composed of a few bacterial taxa. However, the taxonomic composition and community structure of bumble bee gut microbiotas can vary with bee species, environment, and origin (i.e., whether colonies come from the wild or a commercial rearing facility), and it is unclear whether metabolic capabilities therefore vary as well. Here we used metagenomic sequencing to examine gut microbiota community composition, structure, and metabolic potential across bumble bees from two different commercial Bombus impatiens suppliers, wild B. impatiens , and three other wild bumble bee species sampled from sites within the native range of all four species. We found that the community structure of gut microbiotas varied between bumble bee species, between populations from different origins within species, and between commercial suppliers. Notably, we found that Apibacter is consistently present in some wild bumble bee species—suggesting it may be a previously unrecognized core phylotype of bumble bees—and that commercial B. impatiens colonies can lack core phylotypes consistently found in wild populations. However, despite variation in community structure, the high-level metabolic potential of gut microbiotas was largely consistent across all hosts, including for metabolic capabilities related to host performance, though metabolic activity remains to be investigated. IMPORTANCE Our study is the first to compare genome-level taxonomic structure and metabolic potential of whole bumble bee gut microbiotas between commercial suppliers and between commercial and wild populations. In addition, we profiled the full gut microbiotas of three wild bumble bee species for the first time. Overall, our results provide new insight into bumble bee gut microbiota community structure and function and will help researchers evaluate how well studies conducted in one bumble bee population will translate to other populations and species. Research on taxonomic and metabolic variation in bumble bee gut microbiotas across species and origins is of increasing relevance as we continue to discover new ways that social bee gut microbiotas influence host health, and as some bumble bee species decline in range and abundance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.169
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Environmental Microbiology→Same topicPlant and animal studies→French-language works237,207→