Genome-wide SNP-based relationships improve genetic parameter estimates and genomic prediction of growth traits in a large operational breeding trials of <i>Pinus taeda</i> L.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract High-precision estimation of genetic parameters of growth traits is a fundamental requisite for effective selection of individuals to advance breeding cycles and support continued genetic gain in tree improvement. Due to the lack of efficient large-scale cloning techniques of adult trees, plantation forestry of Pinus taeda relies mostly on genetically improved families deployed by seed or clonally propagated from juvenile tissue. The accuracy of genetic parameter estimation is a direct function of the precision by which the genetic relatedness of individuals is measured. To this end, modern tree breeding has increasingly used high-density DNA markers to capture the realized genetic relatedness among individuals into a genomic relationship matrix (GRM) instead of the standard pedigrees. This study aimed to assess the impact of GRM in improving parameter estimation in an operational P. taeda network of progeny trials in southern Brazil. A total of 35 820 individuals from 332 open-pollinated families were measured for growth traits at age five, and 917 of them were genotyped with the Pita50K SNP array. Pedigree-best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models were compared for parameter estimates and predictions of individual tree and family genetic values. Estimates of narrow-sense heritability (${h}_i^2$) were moderate to high, varying between 0.46 for height and 0.68 for diameter at breast height using both ABLUP and ssGBLUP models. Additive genetic correlations among trials indicated low magnitude genotype by environment interaction across trials. Preliminary estimates of genomic predictive ability ranged from 0.34 for height to 0.46 for volume using an RRBLUP model applied exclusively to the genotyped trees. Genotyping a relatively small portion of progeny individuals provides improved accuracies in selecting individuals and families opening the possibility of clonally propagating them from juvenile tissue for large-scale deployment of P. taeda clonal plantations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".