MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4407229133 · doi:10.1101/2025.02.03.636341

USP30 inhibition improves mitochondrial health through both PINK1-dependent and independent mechanisms

2025· preprint· en· W4407229133 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew G Williamson, Rachel Heon‐Roberts, Sarah N. J. Franks, Elliot D. Mock, Hannah B. L. Jones, Elena Britti, Ana Belén Malpartida, Mahmoud A. Bassal, Martha Lavelle, Aina Mogas Barcons, Katherine L. Hammond, Katrina Savory, Pavandeep Rai, Anna Lavayssiere, William McGuinness, Natalie Sepke, Jane Vowles, Iolanda Vendrell, Franziska Guenther, Benedikt M. Kessler, Sally A. Cowley, Katherine S. England, Emma J. Murphy, John B. Davis, Richard Wade‐Martins, Brent J. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Centre
FundersMedical Research CouncilRosetrees Trust
KeywordsPINK1MitochondrionChemistryMitophagyCell biologyBiologyBiochemistryAutophagyApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mitochondrial dysfunction is a key feature of many pathologies, including Parkinson’s disease. The selective vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons is thought to be influenced by mitochondrial dysfunction and mutations in the mitophagy regulating proteins PINK1 and Parkin that are known to cause early-onset Parkinsonism in an autosomal recessive manner. Augmentation of mitophagy through inhibition of USP30 may be a viable therapeutic strategy for a number of diseases including Parkinson’s. USP30 inhibition has been demonstrated to augment PINK1/PRKN mitophagy but also potentiate basal mitophagy to support the removal of dysfunctional mitochondria. Therefore, long-term de-regulation of mitophagy has been proposed to lead to mitochondrial depletion. We have used an integrated approach across cell lines, primary neurons and iPSC-derived dopaminergic neuronal cultures to assess the short and long-term effects of USP30 inhibition on mitochondrial health and neuronal activity. We investigated the dependence of USP30 inhibition phenotypes on the PINK1/Parkin pathway using genetic ablation and in iPSC-derived neurons from Parkinson’s patients with PINK1 or PRKN mutations. Loss of USP30 through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout resulted in increased basal and depolarisation-induced mitophagy in SH-SY5Y cells. Loss of USP30 or pharmacological inhibition altered mitochondrial morphology and led to increases in membrane potential and ATP levels with decreased oxygen consumption, suggesting that USP30 loss results in a more efficient mitochondrial network. These changes in morphology were found to be independent of PINK1 or Parkin. Chronic pharmacological inhibition of USP30 or CRISPRi-mediated knockdown of USP30 did not impact dopaminergic neuronal activity, as assessed by electrophysiological profiling, but did potentiate depolarisation-induced mitophagy in primary and iPSC-derived neuronal cultures. We observed minimal changes in mitophagy levels in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons from Parkinson’s patients with PINK1 or PRKN mutations that were independent of the ability to produce p65Ub. Importantly, within this experimental paradigm, pharmacological USP30 inhibition increased depolarisation-induced mitophagy in both PINK1 and PRKN patients to the same extent as control neurons. These results support a role for USP30 in modulating the trigger threshold for mitophagy and suggest that USP30 inhibitors may be beneficial in patients with impairments in PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways→French-language works237,207→