MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407232081 · doi:10.15173/glj.v15i3.5924

Review of Marcel van der Linden and Nicole Mayer-Ahuja (editors) (2023) Power at Work – A Global Perspective on Control and Resistance.

2024· article· en· W4407232081 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Klikauer

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Labour Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Resistance (ecology)Power (physics)Work (physics)SociologyEnvironmental ethicsComputer sciencePhilosophyArtificial intelligenceEngineeringEcologyBiologyMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China, Turkey, New Zealand, Yugoslavia, South Africa, Belgium and the Democratic Republic of the Congo.Marcel van der Linden and Nicole Mayer-Ahuja have divided their edited volume into ten chapters, plus an introduction and a conclusion.Van der Linden starts his historical perspective by emphasising that "already in 1685, the French Code Noir provided a legal framework for slavery" (Van der Linden, 2023: 2).Two things are noteworthy on this.First, this sharply contradicts the apostles of neo-liberalism's make-believe that deregulation of business is the prevailing mode of operation.In reality, work has been regulated for a very long time.Second, law makes managerial domination over workers possible.All too often, law is merely an accessory for capitalism (Pistor, 2019).Unlike the many anti-worker and anti-union laws that underwrite capitalism, "workers have generally been in favour of restricting employer's discretionary power as much as possible" (Van der Linden, 2023: 3).In essence, what is assumed to be "discretionary power" actually boils down to management's despotic caprice, arbitrariness and whims.Page 3 covers what the entire book is all about, namely, the "constant shifting [of the] frontier of control" (Van der Linden, 2023: 3) between workers and management.In great and often highly illuminating detail, the book explains these shifting frontiers.Not surprisingly, "Karl Marx referred to this as the silent coercion of economic circumstance, which reduce workers' capacity to confront management" (Van der Linden, 2023: 4).To camouflage this, the ideologues of neo-liberalism put up a "ceremonial faade" (Van der Linden, 2023: 5) of supposedly free labour freely entering into the labour market -unless, of course, one wants to be exposed to meagre rations of a constantly diminishing welfare state.The French Nobel Prize winner Anatole France once explained, "the law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread".Meanwhile, and despite the known power asymmetries in the labour market (Offe & Wiesenthal, 1980) that structurally disadvantage workers and greatly advantage management, the author correctly notes that "where there is power, there is resistance" (Van der Linden, 2023: 6).Yet, managerial "coercion still exists" (Van der Linden, 2023: 6), as can be observed from an Amazon warehouse to a Bangladeshi sweatshop.However, Van der Linden also writes that "absolute control is impossible" (Van der Linden, 2023: 12).As a consequence, "managers always need some degree of voluntary cooperative effort from their workers" (Van der Linden, 2023: 11).On the other hand, "even today, workers resort

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Labour JournalSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207