MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4407239073 · doi:10.33137/cpoj.v7i2.44494

DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF AN ANTERIORLY MOUNTED MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED POWERED HIP JOINT PROSTHESIS

2025· article· en· W4407239073 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kelly Brannen, Natalie Baddour, Lucas Cho, David Langlois, Patrick Dumond, Edward D. Lemaire

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsProsthesisJoint (building)GaitComputer scienceAnkleBiomechanicsSimulationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationOrthodonticsMedicineEngineeringSurgeryStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic solutions for individuals with hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy amputations currently rely exclusively on passive hip joint mechanisms. Although powered knee and ankle joint prostheses have improved gait in people with amputation, no powered hip joint options are commercially available. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the mechanism, structural integrity, and design of an anteriorly mounted powered hip joint prosthesis. METHODOLOGY: A microprocessor-controlled powered hip joint prosthesis (PHP) was developed, incorporating a cable-and-pulley transmission system. Stress calculations and Finite Element Analysis (FEA) were performed to ensure that the device can withstand the forces from daily activities. The prototype underwent mechanical strength testing in accordance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 15032:2000 standards, ensuring suitability for user loads of up to 100 kg. For functional testing, three able-bodied individuals were video recorded while walking with the power hip in a prosthesis simulator. For each participant, hip angles and stride parameters during level walking were assessed by analyzing five gait cycles. FINDINGS: The novel PHP met most of the design criteria; however, it protruded 56 mm anteriorly from the lamination plate, exceeding the specified criterion of 20 mm. The joint's range of motion included 22° of extension and 145° of flexion. The joint prototype's height was 347 mm, and it weighed 3.9 kg. Furthermore, it passed ISO 15032:2000 strength tests, withstanding a 3360 Newton (N) load without failure. The device successfully enabled able-bodied individuals to walk using a hip disarticulation simulator and supported a 98 kg user during level walking. CONCLUSION: The microprocessor-controlled PHP exhibited successful performance in both mechanical strength and functional testing. Future work is needed to optimize and assess the design, which could reduce the device's weight and size. A complex control system to adjust gait based on pelvic motion is currently under development. Layman's Abstract Currently, prosthetic solutions for people with hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy amputation rely solely on passive prosthetic hip joints. While powered knee and ankle joints prostheses can improve gait, there are no powered hip joints prostheses available on the market. This study introduced and evaluated a powered hip joint prosthesis with a cable-and-pulley transmission system. The powered hip joint prosthesis met most of the design criteria and has range of motion of 22° of extension and 145° of flexion. The heigh of the joint was 347 mm, and it weighed 3.9 kg. Furthermore, it passed the strength tests, withstanding a 3360 Newton (N) load without failure. To evaluate the joint's performance, testing was conducted with three able-bodied individuals using a prosthesis simulator during level walking. This joint successfully enabled able-bodied individuals to walk and supported a 98 kg user during level walking. Future work is needed to optimize and assess the design, to reduce the device's weight and size. Furthermore, a control system to improve movement and function is needed and is currently under development. Article PDF Link: https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/cpoj/article/view/44494/33657 How To Cite: Brannen K, Baddour N, Cho L, Langlois D, Dumond P, Lemaire E.D. Development and evaluation of an anteriorly mounted microprocessor-controlled powered hip joint prosthesis. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal. 2024; Volume 7, Issue 2, No. 7. https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v7i1.44494 Corresponding Author: Professor Edward Lemaire, PhDAffiliation: Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.E-Mail: elemaire@uottawa.caORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4693-2623

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Prosthetics & Orthotics JournalSame topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207